 |
 
|
A Critical Review of IgG Immunoglobulins
and Food Allergy – Implications
in Systemic Health
Raymond M. Suen, MT (ASCP), Shalima Gordon,
ND
Food allergy is defined as an adverse
clinical reaction due to an immune-mediated hypersensitivity response
resulting from the ingestion of a food. A wide variety of foods
have been shown to produce allergic reactions including cow’s milk;
chicken eggs; legumes; fish and shellfish; and cereals.[1] Depending on the speed of onset of symptoms,
less than 45 minutes to 2 hours to days, immediate and delayed
food allergies have been described throughout the literature encompassing
a variety of gastrointestinal, respiratory, and cutaneous pathologies.[2] The inflammatory response is the common theme
to all allergic pictures and is characterized by the release of
chemical mediators, vasodilation, increased vascular permeability,
edema, and tissue damage.
The role of IgE in Type I immediate
hypersensitivity allergic reactions is well understood in the scientific
literature. In classic Type I IgE-mediated hypersensitivity, food-specific
IgE antibodies bind to FcεRI and FcεRII receptors on
the cell membranes of mast cells, basophils, macrophages, monocytes,
lymphoctes, eosinophils and platelets. Inflammatory mediators including
histamine, serotonin, and tumor necrosis factor alpha, are released
and induce symptoms upon exposure of these bound antibodies with
food antigens that have penetrated the protective intestinal mucosal
barrier. It is generally understood that symptoms of an IgE-mediated
allergy manifest within 2 hours of consumption of the culpable
food. Classical atopic symptoms include; urticaria, eczema, respiratory
and nasal symptoms, and gastrointestinal distress. In the gut specifically,
mast cell degranulation and mediator release promotes muscle contraction,
stimulates pain fibers, increases mucus production, recruits inflammatory
cells, and increases permeability to macromolecules, the latter
of which may perpetuate a vicious cycle of food antigen exposure
and symptoms.[3] Specific IgE has a half-life of only 1-2 days
in circulation however, exhibits residual activity on mast cells
of about 2 weeks with late phase reactions and inflammatory changes.[4]
It is strongly argued in the scientific
literature that allergic reactions may occur independent of antigen-specific
IgE. High affinity receptors for IgG (FcgammaRI), on human mast
cells and basophils, are activated in immediate hypersensitivity reactions,
following receptor aggregation through IgG binding. IgG-mediated
immediate hypersensitivity results in degranulation, with the release
of histamine and arachidonic acid metabolites.[5] Okayama et al, have demonstrated that the
mediator profile through
activation of FcgammaRI receptors on
human mast cells, is qualitatively indistinguishable from responses
stimulated through FcepsilonRI, the high affinity receptor for
IgE.[6] In addition,
FcgammaRI receptor expression on mast cells is up regulated by
IFN-gamma, allowing for recruitment of mast cells through IgG-dependent
mechanisms into the IFN-gamma-rich inflammatory locus.[7],[8],[9] IgG-mediated
immediate hypersensitivity, also known as IgG-mediated anaphylaxis,
is not a new concept in allergy research. In conventional circles,
anaphylaxis denotes an immediate hypersensitivity reaction to an
allergen, exclusively mediated by IgE antibodies. Hence, the foundation
of the skin-scratch testing method, which detects IgE –induced
histamine release through a wheal and flare response from antigen
provocation, and IgE RAST quantification. However, as early as
the 1970’s, Parish demonstrated the presence of anaphylactic IgG
antibodies in human sera.[10] Halpern et al, later suggested that this IgG
anaphylactic antibody is indeed a subtype of IgG4. Further studies
from Bryant et al, and Pepys have shown that IgG anaphylactic antibody
activity could not be removed through precipitation with anti-IgE
but, only by precipitation with anti-IgG, clearly indicating a
novel mechanism for mast cell recruitment into inflammation.[11],[12] However,
the potential for IgG4 to inhibit, or block IgE–mediated anaphylaxis
is a clearly established theme in this line of research, and some
authors argue a correlation between increased IgE levels and IgG4
in atopic patients, where IgG4 is thought to hamper antigen binding
to cell-bound IgE which would otherwise promote a much stronger
allergic reaction. Moreover, the basic principle behind allergen
immunotherapy (IT), is oral or intradermal administration of the
allergen to induce the development of a systemic immune response,
including the production of systemic blocking antibodies. In an
update on immunotherapy, “Immunotherapy update: mechanisms of action”,
Greenberger concludes that the reduction of allergic symptoms,
specifically of allergic rhinitis and asthma, reflect changes in
the cytokine and immunoglobulin profile from intradermal allergen
provocation. Most notably, intradermal grass injection resulted
in a profound increase in antiallergen IgG (2-10 fold), IgG4 (10-100
fold), a decline in antiallergen IgE antibodies, reduced numbers
of nasal or bronchial mast cells and eosinophils, down-regulation
of T-helper 2-lymphocytes and IL-4, and a lack of increase in interferon
gamma.[13] This study clearly establishes
IgG4 as a blocking antibody. Furthermore, in a study involving
42 children with malabsorption disorders, those demonstrating high
levels of IgG antibodies to ovalbumin (Anti-OA) showed
significantly lower serum concentrations
of OA at both 2 and 8 hours after oral OA administration, compared
to children with lower anti-OA levels. The researchers conclude
that the high levels of IgG antibodies to ovalbumin demonstrate
blocking capacity in the circulation. Such antibodies in the intestinal
secretions and in the gut wall would limit the quantity of antigen
that can penetrate the mucosa and enter circulation.[14] However,
other studies show elevated IgG4 in symptomatic atopic patients
without a concomitant rise in IgE levels.[15],[16],[17]
Supporting evidence from Yoshida et
al, demonstrate that IgG4 is not only elevated in milk allergic
children, for example, but diagnostic of milk allergy in atopic
children independent of IgE.[18] In
another study, milk-specific IgG4 in particular, IgG4 to casein,
has been shown to be diagnostic of milk allergy causing eczema
in adults.[19] In
an elegant study by Eysink et al, atopy could be correctly classified
in 75.4% of young children studied with or without eczema, through
identification of high levels of IgG to certain foods. In particular,
high levels of IgG antibodies to egg, milk, orange, and a mixture
of wheat and rice, were identified in atopic children compared
to nonatopic children. Further, this elevation served as a positive
predictor of increased IgE antibodies to inhalant allergens, namely
cat, dog, and house dust mite. The investigators of this study
conclude that the association drawn from these results may clearly
identify children with an increased risk of developing future allergic
disease.[20]
Other reports demonstrating the importance
of IgG antibodies in food allergies include IgG-mediated allergy
to casein and other milk proteins, which has been implicated in
the development and progression of infantile autism.[21] Furthermore, one study involving rheumatoid arthritis,
showed a decrease in gluten-specific IgG serum levels which correlated
with an improvement in the symptoms of this disease in 40% of subjects
placed on a gluten-free diet, compared to a 4% improvement in a
control group, over a one-year period.[22]
The evidence from the above research
suggests that IgG4 antibodies may act as sensitizing as well as
blocking antibodies. This dual role of IgG4, anaphylactic or blocking
antibody, lends way to defining IgG4 subtypes 4a and 4b, as described
by Halpern and Scott in their review, “Non-IgE mediated mechanisms
in food allergy”, whereby exposure to an allergen may lead to the
production of the anaphylactic or nonanaphylactic/blocking subtype
of which may depend on genetic predisposition and environmental
factors.[23] It is interesting to note that there is some
structural homology between IgG4a, IgG1 and IgG3 immunoglobulins,
and between IgG4b and IgG2.[24] IgG
subclass antibodies and their role in the pathogenesis of food
allergic disease deserves considerable attention. Chronicity of
antigen exposure, a hyperactive mucosal immune system and/or an
increased permeability to macromolecules, are factors to consider
influential in IgG4 subclass expression and progression of disease.
A distinguishing feature of IgG4 is
its inability to activate the classical complement pathway. This
supports the role of IgG4 as a blocking antibody. In a study of
egg hypersensitivity, Nakagawa draws our attention to IgG1 involvement
in clinical egg hypersensitivity, suggesting that increased IgG4
reduces the effect of complement-fixing antibodies like IgG1; a
good prognostic sign as he suggests.[25] This is further supported by
Van Der Zee, who shows that IgG4 antibodies inhibit complement
activation of IgG1 antibodies, probably through competitive binding
for related antigenic determinants.[26]
Like all immune mediated reactions,
food allergies depend on the intimate association between mature
T-helper cells and B-lymphocytes with the production and release
of inflammatory mediators and activation of food-specific antibodies. After
B-cells are stimulated by antigen, they are terminally differentiated
into plasma cells of which secrete antigen-specific immunoglobulins.
A review of T-helper 2 (TH2) and T-helper
1 (TH1)-induced antibody production reminds us that interleukin-2
(IL2), interferon gamma (IFN gamma), and tumor necrosis factor
beta (TNF beta), via TH1 T-helper cell activity, favors B-lymphocyte
class switching to the production of IgG2a. Conversely, IL-4 and
IL-5 secreted by TH2 T-helper cells induce class switching to IgE
and IgG1. The exact role of the different subclasses of IgG remains
to be understood. Studies suggest sequential switching as a prerequisite
for B-cell differentiation, most prominent in cells that switch
to IgE. For instance, B-cells cultured with interleukin-4 show
IgG1/IgE double-positive staining, which appear after 3 days of
culture, after which predominantly secrete IgE on reculture. This
serves as an interesting note suggesting an essential switch from
IgG1 with possible prerequisite involvement in IgE production.[27] The amount of antigen absorbed, the quantity
of antibody required, the chronicity of antigen exposure, and the
specific role of IgG subclasses in the pathogenesis of food allergic
illness, clearly influence progression of disease, and define the
magnitude of the immune response to dietary antigen to warrant
further investigation.
A key feature of food allergies that
deserves close attention is its implications in the development
and maintenance of immune cell memory from chronic and repeated
exposure to food allergens, with resultant clinical consequences.
Food-induced immune reaction favors maturation and proliferation
of naïve T-cells into CD4 and CD8 effector T-cell lines. Under
chronic antigen exposure CD4 populations generate distinct populations,
as mentioned above, TH1 and TH2 of which TH2 promotes the activation
of cytokines favoring immunoglobulin production. From chronic antigen
exposure there is a pronounced alteration in the ratio between
TH1 and TH2, suggesting immune imbalance, polyclonal B-cell activation,
and an exaggerated immunoglobulin response. This mechanism of action
has been argued for autoimmune disease due to chronic antigen exposure,
and has interesting implications in food allergies, which also
represent a state of chronic antigen exposure. As such, the role
of IgG in delayed-onset food allergies deserves close attention
for its implications in systemic disease.
There is no argument regarding the
presence of serum IgG reactive with different dietary proteins.
Specific serum IgG antibodies to different food proteins have been
reported in significant numbers of adults and children in cases
of celiac disease, dermatitis herpetiformis, and atopic eczema.[28],[29] Moreover,
higher total and specific serum IgG4 levels to common foods are
raised in cases of atopic eczema compared to the healthy population.[30],[31] The
presence of elevated levels of IgG antibodies to food antigens
have been observed substantially in diseases with increased intestinal
permeability, in particular, IgA deficiency[32] and inflammatory bowel disease.[33]
The role of secretory IgA (sIgA) is
clear; induction of mucosal immunity and establishment of oral
tolerance through oral immunization with food antigens occurs in
most normal individuals, and plays a major role in antigen handling
and elimination. The elevation of IgG in IgA-deficient states
suggests increased intestinal permeability to macromolecules. In
other words, a lack of sIgA may permit the permeation of undigested
food antigens into the bloodstream, thereby allowing for immune
complex formation and circulation for an uncertain period of time. Cunningham
et al, conclude from their study involving IgA-deficient subjects,
that milk and other protein precipitins are a common feature in
IgA deficiency, and that a high proportion of these individuals
may have circulating immune complexes of these food antigens.[34] In addition, a review by Saavedra-Delgado and Metcalfe explain
from other studies, that the presence of circulating IgG-food antibodies
is consistent with increased absorption of food antigens and stimulation
of antibody production, as a result of mucosal damage. These authors
note that circulating antigen-antibody complexes are more frequently
detected in symptomatic cases of ulcerative colitis as evidenced
by IgG-immune complex deposition and complement in colonic epithelium
along the basement membrane.
It is not difficult to conceive a rationale
for the observed elevation in IgG antibody levels to food antigens
in IgA-deficient states, when we consider the mechanisms of oral
tolerance. Oral tolerance lies at the heart of immunological theories
and is the cornerstone of setting up a reaction or non-reaction
against self and non-self (dietary challenge). Factors influential
in the induction of an immune response with IgE and IgG expression,
versus the induction of active suppression, or immune tolerance,
an IgA response, are cutting edge research and are under considerable
investigation. Oral tolerance to dietary antigens via TH3-cell
activity, or suppressive intra-epithelial lymphocytes (IEL’s),
is the B-cell switching from IgE/IgG antibody production to IgA,
under the influence of a novel cytokine profile unlike that governing
TH1/TH2 mechanisms. In particular, transforming growth factor beta
(TGF-B), the predominant oral tolerance cytokine, is released by
activated IEL’s and suppresses any potential for TH1 or TH2 response
to dietary antigen, thereby favoring IgA expression and active
suppression. Bias towards immune response TH1/TH2, or immune tolerance
TH3, is dependent on the cytokine profile elaborated under the
influence of the gastrointestinal mucosal immune milieu, defined
by the individual’s defense factors, innate and acquired. It is
especially important to note that the immune response favored in
the adult will differ from that of the neonate, where there is
a predilection towards oral tolerance in the latter. In any event,
local gastrointestinal immunity, through the expression of a cytokine
profile indicative of either an immune response or active suppression,
each being unique, will have systemic consequences, as these cytokines
migrate to other mucosal sites and peripheral tissues, with implications
in the onset and progression of symptoms. [35]
It is proposed that the breakdown of
oral tolerance, and hence sensitization to dietary antigens may
occur early in life during a viral or bacterial infection, under
conditions where the secretory immune system has not fully matured.
By that means, a hyperresponsive state to dietary agents is set
up, with inflammation and the development of inflammatory bowel
disease; ulcerative colitis or Crohn’s disease.[36] By definition, inflammatory
bowel disease is the loss of tolerance to normal flora with consequential
hypersensitive food reactions and systemic sequelae.[37] These
arguments are supported by many authors including Tahmeed and Fuchs,
who comment in their review that intestinal infections and reduced
secretory IgA may alter intestinal permeability resulting in an
increased uptake of food antigens thereby initiating an abnormal
mucosal immune response and chronic enteropathy.[38] The breakdown of oral tolerance and resultant disease is far-
reaching and characterizes a number of conditions including childhood
onset Type I hypersensitivity, celiac disease, and a number of
autoimmune conditions. [39]
Mucosal exclusion of dietary antigens
other than via secretory IgA has also been demonstrated to occur
through experimentally induced high titers of IgG antibodies. However,
some in vitro experiments using everted gut sacs show the contrary,
with enhanced intestinal absorption of antigen under the influence
of high IgG titers.[40],[41] Tolo
et al, through in vitro studies of rabbit oral mucosal membranes,
found that serum-derived IgG antibody retards the penetration of
corresponding antigen, however impairs the mucosal barrier nonetheless,
by allowing for concurrent mucosal penetration of unrelated macromolecules.[42] It
is not unreasonable to rationalize a similar set of circumstances
for intestinal epithelia given sufficient experimental data. Immunohistochemical
studies demonstrate an abundance of serum-derived IgG present in
the lamina propria of mucous membranes, traces of which diffuse
into the intestinal epithelial interstices. Immune complex formation
in these sites may on the one hand, perturb mucosal antigen uptake
by signaling the emigration of neutrophils with phagocytosis and
protein degradation. On the other hand, the local emigration of
other immune cells and the release of inflammatory mediators may
concomitantly enhance mucosal permeability and penetration of other
food macromolecules. As such, IgG may in effect compromise mucosal
integrity through undue penetration of new food antigens thereby
setting up a vicious cycle. To review, by activating complement,
IgG antibodies may promote increased mucosal permeability, tissue
damage, and persistent immunopathology. In addition, IgE antibodies
may enter the gut mucosa via mast cells causing their degranulation
with histamine release and mucosal lesion formation as well. Such
immunological mechanisms may therefore perpetuate an inflammatory
state of the bowels with undue systemic exposure to dietary antigens.[43]
It is important to note that intestinal
hyperpermeability is not necessarily a prerequisite for penetration
of food antigens into the lamina propria and systemic circulation.
Kleinman and Walker mention that small, nutritionally insignificant
amounts of antigenically intact macromolecules may be transferred
across the gut lining through simple mechanisms.[44] With this in mind, when we consider the absorption of pounds
of foods on a daily basis, continuous exposure between food antigen,
most often of the foods eaten regularly, and stimulation of intestinal
lymphoid follicles may very well provide the impetus for the development
of a systemic immune response with circulating antibody complexes
and atopic reactions.
In Type III, immune complex-mediated
hypersensitivity, IgG antibodies combine with food antigen forming
circulating immune complexes to which complement is fixed. These
immunocomplexes may circulate throughout the periphery and deposit
in various tissues promoting an Arthus-like inflammatory reaction
with vasculitis and tissue damage. Intestinal biopsy studies have
shown evidence of this type of immune-mediated reaction in the
pathogenesis of cow’s milk sensitive colitis.[45] In another study, Lee et al,
have demonstrated deposition of human IgG and precipitins to cow’s
milk in lung tissue specimens of infants with pulmonary hemosiderosis.
Immunofluorescence of snap-frozen biopsy tissue in these infants
exceeded that in control lung biopsies. The researchers suggest
a Type III mediated mechanism to explain the presence of the milk-related
pulmonary infiltrates. Absorption of the milk antigens through
the intestine with subsequent deposition of the circulating immune
complexes could not be discounted as there was no evidence to suggest
aspiration, and symptoms appeared within the hour following consumption
of cow’s milk with notable immune complexes appearing in the serum.[46]
Since immunocomplexes, through Type
III hypersensitivity are free in circulation, the implications
of multiple end organ pathology are not without possible justifications.
It may be possible to correlate such phenomena to the pathogenesis
and etiology of certain autoimmune disease[47],
connective tissue disorders, and perhaps malignancy.
In addition to IgG involvement in Type
I and III hypersensitivity reactions, there are concrete studies
demonstrating the role of specific IgG antibodies to food allergens
in Type II immune mechanisms as well. In Type II, antibody-dependent
cytotoxic hypersensitivity, specific IgG recognize and bind to
food antigens that have adhered to the surface of cells. Antigen-antibody
bound complex activates the complement cascade and the release
of cytotoxic substances from activated killer cells, with eventual
cell death. Cow’s milk-induced thrombocytopenia has been implicated
by this type of reaction.[48]
Through Type IV, cell-mediated delayed
hypersensitivity, IgG antibody activity plays an integral role
in this type of immune response as well. Type IV mechanisms represent
a major immunological pathway in conditions such as cow’s milk-induced
enteropathy and celiac disease.[49] Food
induced gastroenteropathy, specifically celiac disease, has been
clearly defined through Type IV mechanisms with the involvement
of IgG specific antibodies to wheat gliadin. In this condition,
abnormalities in intestinal permeability are associated with both
inflammatory processes and loss of jejunal microvilli favoring
the absorption of large molecules that pose an allergenic threat.
Kemeny et al, have demonstrated increased IgG1 antibody levels
to gliadin, ovalbumin, and casein in addition to elevated IgG4
to casein in untreated celiac patients compared to healthy control
subjects.[50] In
addition, in immediate-type egg allergic patients, these investigators
found raised IgG1 antibody levels to ovalbumin, compared to healthy
control subjects.[51] In
the celiac subjects, in particular, both IgG1 and IgG4 antibody
levels to gluten fell from a gluten-free diet.
As a clinical aside, anti-gliadin IgG
antibodies are a sensitive screening test for jejunal biopsy in
patients with suspected celiac disease. Also, the monitoring
of the disappearance of gliadin antibodies during a gluten-free
diet can be used to indicate successful elimination of gluten from
the diet.
Symptoms of delayed food allergies
are diverse and may affect any system in the body. It can be argued
that delayed-onset food allergies are much more common than the
more widely accepted IgE-mediated immediate hypersensitivity reactions.
In addition, IgG-mediated food allergies may account for a variety
of chronic health conditions that have otherwise been misdiagnosed
and thus unresponsive to conventional medical care. Fatigue, irritability,
aching joints, cognitive dysfunction, and chronic migraines are
a few known complications due to food allergies, which suggest
a strong IgG component due to their chronic nature. The diagnosis
of food allergy is made simple though serum ELISA analysis for
IgG-specific food antigens. The condition is treated by eliminating
the allergenic food from the diet for an indefinite period of time.
Typically, IgG subclasses exhibit a
half-life of about 21 days with a residual time on mast cells of
about 2 to 3 months.[52] However,
due to the long survival of IgG relative to other serum immunoglobulins,
immune complex formation may persist in circulation for an indefinite
period of time. As such, the time period required to abstain from
the allergenic foods is arguable, and may extend for up to 9-12
months as in the case of cow’s milk allergy.[53]
The production of antibodies to dietary
antigens, especially of the IgG class takes place as an immune
response to food antigens. This is true and well established through
food allergy provocation studies and quantification of IgG via
ELISA methodology. Effector function of the different subclasses
varies. Chronicity of food antigen exposure, gastrointestinal mucosal
integrity, and host immune competence, are a few of the physiological
circumstances that influence subclass IgG expression, activation
of complement, and cellular immune mechanisms. Together, these
functional components of the mucosal immune system orchestrate
progression or neutralization of the inflammatory process induced
by food antigen exposure, the former of which may promote varying
symptomology.
An appreciation of the associated symptoms of food allergy poses
a unique challenge to the clinician both because of the variability
in severity and onset. As such, food allergy should not, by any
means, be underestimated as a key etiological factor in disease
and disease progression. Gastrointestinal food allergy is a fascinating
line of research that merits close consideration in clinical practice
for the assessment and care of our patients.
The US BioTek
Advantage
US BioTek
employs Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay methodology, or ELISA,
a simple, safe and reliable test that demonstrates food-antigen-specific
IgE and IgG in serum.
ELISA is a semi-quantitative analysis
designed to assess immediate (IgE) and delayed (IgG) immune reactivity
to food antigens. Our region-specific inhalant panels assess
for immediate IgE hypersensitivity.
Allergic reactions to foods and
inhalants are characterized by enhanced allergen-specific immunoglobulin
serum levels with activation of immune mediators of inflammation.
Research indicates that food and inhalant allergies are implicated
in a number of health problems. Through ELISA testing we provide
a useful tool with which an individual’s sensitization to food
and inhalant allergens can be assessed.
Through this testing method, a multi-well
ELISA plate is coated with purified food proteins and glycoproteins
or, inhalants at a specific concentration. The patient’s serum
sample is then added to the plate. If the patient’s serum contains
antibodies to any of these specific and defined food or inhalant
proteins, a binding reaction will occur. The degree of antibody-antigen
binding is dependent on the concentration of antibodies present
in the patient’s serum. This reaction is detected through a
color change and assessed spectrophotometrically.
Our ELISA limit of detection for
IgE is 391 picograms/ml, which is well below 200 nanograms that
define normal total serum concentration, and 900 nanograms that
define the majority of atopic individuals.[54] Our limit of detection for specific IgG is 1.5 micrograms/ml
which is also well below cited reference ranges in current literature.
US BioTek ELISA tests for IgG4 and
Total IgG in serum. IgG pool testing ensures maximal recovery
of both symptom-provoking and potential “blocking” IgG antibodies;
key indicators of an immune response to a food allergen.
With our ELISA testing, we do each
and every serum specimen in complete duplicate when we perform
the analysis, assuring that there is no more than a 20% variance
between each run. This allows us to use the patient as his or
her own control.
We also perform daily in-house blinded
split sample reproducibility checks using both positive and negative
controls, in accordance to Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments
(CLIA), proficiency testing criteria, for acceptable analytical
performance.[55] Our
goal is to take every measure to ensure reproducible and reliable
results.
We subscribe to the College of American
Pathologists (CAP); certified and accredited under COLA (Commission
of Laboratory Accreditation). Under the oversight of the Washington
State Department of Health, USBioTek Laboratories is recognized
and holds a Medical Test Site License, and is obligated to abide
by the Federal Government’s enacted rules and regulations for
medical laboratories. We also participate with the American Association
of Bioanalysts Proficiency Testing Service for periodic blinded
testing.
These measures and many other quality
control procedures, assure us precision, consistency, and objectivity
from day-to-day and week-to-week testing.
References
[1] Tahmeed, Ahmed., Fuchs, J. George., Gastrointestinal
Allergy to Food: A Review. J Diarrhoeal Dis Res, 15(4):
211-223,1997.
[4] Rafei, Ahmed., et al, Diagnostic Value of IgG4 Measurements
in Patients with Food Allergy. Annals of Allerg, 62:94-99, 1989.
[5] Tkaczyk, C., et al, Activation of Human Mast Cells
Through the High Affinity IgG Receptor. Mol Immunol, 38(16-18):
1289, 2002.
[6] Okayama, Y., Hagaman, D.D., Metcalfe, D.D., A Comparison
of Mediators Released or Generated by IFN-Gamma- Treated Human
Mast Cells Following Aggregation of Fcgamma RI or Fcepsilon
RI. J Immunol, 166(7): 4705-12, 2001.
[8] Uciechowski, P., et al, IFN-Gamma Induces the High-Affinity
Fc Receptor I for IgG (CD64) on Human Glomerular Mesangial
Cells. Eur J Immunol, 28(9): 2928-35,1998.
[9] Woolhiser, M.R., et al, IgG-Dependent Activation of
Human Mast Cells Following Up-Regulation of FcgammaRI by IFN-Gamma. Eur
J Immunol, 31(11): 3298-307.
[10] Parish, W.E, Short-Term Anaphylactic IgG Antibodies
in Human Sera. Lancet, 2:591, 1970.
[11] Bryant, D.H., Burns, M.W., Lazarus, C., Identification
of IgG Antibody as a Carrier of Reaginic Activity in Asthmatic
Patients. J Allergy Clin Immunology, 56:417, 1975.
[12] Pepys, J., et al, Clinical Correlations Between Long-Term
(IgE) and Short-Term (IgG S-TS) Anaphylactic Antibodies in
Atopic and “Nonatopic” Subjects with Respiratory Allergic Disease. Clin
Allergy, 9:645, 1979.
[13] Greenberger, PA., Immunotherapy Update: Mechanism of
Action. Allergy Asthma Proc, 23-(6): 373-6,2002.
[14] Dannaeus, A., Inganas, M., Johansson, S.G.O., Foucard,
T., Intestinal Uptake of Ovalbumin in Malabsorption and Food
Allergy in Relation to Serum IgG Antibody and Orally Administered
Sodium Cromoglycate. Clinical Allergy, 9:263-270, 1979.
[15] Furic, R., et al, The Development of Sensitive Radioimmunoassay
to Detect IgG4 Immunogobulin. Clin Rev Allergy, 1:213-224,
1983.
[16] Halpern, Georges M., Scott, John R., Non-IgE Antibody
Mediated Mechanisms in Food Allergy. Annals of Allergy, 58:14-27,1987.
[17] Paganelli, R., et al, Isotypic Analysis of Antibody
Response to a Food Antigen in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Int
Archs Allergy apppl. Immun, 78:81-85, 1985.
[18] Yoshida, S., et al, Beta-lactoglobulin-Specific IgE
and IgG in Sera of Patients with Milk Allergy. 5th International
Food Allergy Symposium. Atlanta, Georgia, 1984.
[19] Shakib, F, Clinical Relevance of Food-Specific IgG4
Antibodies. N Engl Reg Allergy Proc, 9(1): 63-6, 1988.
[20] Eysink, P.E.D., et al, Relation Between IgG Antibodies
to Foods and IgE Antibodies to Milk, Egg, Cat, Dog and/or Mite
in a Cross-Sectional Study. Clinical and Experimental Allergy, 29:604-610,
1999.
[21] Lucarelli, S., et al, Food Allergy and Infantile Autism. Panminerva
Med, 37(3): 137-41,1995.
[22] Hafstrom, I., et al, A Vegan Diet Free of Gluten Improves
the Signs and Symptoms of Rheumatoid Arthritis: the Effects
on Arthritis Correlate with a Reduction in Antibodies to Food
Antigens. Hematology (Oxford), 40(10): 1175-9,2001.
[24] Van Der Zee, J.S., Aalberse, R.C., Immunochemical Characteristics
of IgG4 Antibodies. N Engl Reg Allergy Proc, 9(1): 31-33,
1988.
[25] Nakagawa, T, Egg White-Specific IgE and IgG Subclass
Antibodies and their Associations with Clinical Egg Hypersensitivity. N
Engl Reg Allergy Proc, 9(1): 67-73, 1988.
[26] Van De Zee, op. cit.
[27] Coffman, Robert L., Lebman, Deborah A., Rothman, Paul.,
Mechanism and Regulation of Immunoglobulin Isotype Switching. Advances
in Immunology, 54:229-262, 1993.
[28] Barnes, R.M., et al, IgG Subclass of Human Serum Antibodies
Reactive with Dietary Proteins. Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol, 81(2):
141-7, 1986.
[29] Casimir, G.J., et al, Atopic Dermatitis: Role of Food
and House Dust Mite Allergens. Pediatrics, 92(2): 252-6,1993.
[30] Merrett, J., et al, Total and Specific IgG4 Antibody
Levels in Atopic Eczema. Clin Exp Immunol, 56(3): 645-52,1984.
[31] Garcia, B.E., et al, Value of IgG4 Antibodies Against
Foods in Atopic Dermatitis. Allergol Immunopathol (Madr),
18(4): 187-90, 1990.
[32] Cunningham-Rundles, C., et al, Milk Precipitans, Circulating
Immune Complexes and IgA Deficiency. Proc Natl Acad Sci, 75
(7): 3387- 3389, 1978.
[34] Cunningham-Rundles, op. cit.
[35] Plummer, Nigel, Oral Tolerance: Revolutionary Implications
in Immunological Health and Disease. Pharmax LLC: Practical
Solutions Seminar Series. Bellevue, WA. June 7-8, 2003.
[36] Saavedra-Delgado, Ana Maria., Metcalfe, Dean D., Interactions
Between Food Antigens and the Immune System in the Pathogenesis
of Gastrointestinal Diseases. Annals of Allergy, 55:694-702,
1985.
[40] Tolo, K., Brandtzaeg, P., Jonsen, J., Mucosal Penetration
of Antigen in the Presence or Absence of Serum-Derived Antibody.Immunology, 33:733-743,
1977.
[41] Quinti, I., et al, IgG Subclasses to Food Antigens. Allergie
Immunol, 20:41,1988.
[43] Brandtzaeg, P., et a, The Human Gastrointestinal Secretory
Immune System in Health and Disease. Scand J Gastroenterol
Suppl, 114:17-38, 1985.
[44] Kleinman, Ronald E., Walker, Allan W., Antigen Processing
and Uptake from the Intestinal Tract. Clin Rev Allergy, 2:25-37,1984.
[45] Saavedra-Delgado, op. cit.
[46] Lee, Sok Kyu., et al, Cow’s Milk-Induced Pulmonary
Disease in Children. Adv Pediatr, 25:399-57, 1978.
[47] Karjalainen, J., et al, A Bovine Albumin Peptide as
a Possible Trigger of Insulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus. N
Engl J Med, 327(5): 302-7, 1992.
[48] Caffrey, E., et al, Thrombocytopenia Caused by Cow’s
Milk. Lancet, 2:316, 1981.
[49] Gershwin, Eric M., German, Bruce J., Keen, Carl L.,
eds. Nutrition and Immunology: Principles and Practice.
New Jersey: Humana Press, Inc., 2000.
[50] Kemeny, D.M., et al, Sub-Class of IgG in Allergic Disease
I. IgG Sub-class Antibodies in Immediate and Non-immediate
Food Allergy. Clinical Allergy, 16: 571-581, 1986.
[54] Roitt, Ivan., Brostoff, Johnathan., Male, David. Immunology
5th Ed. London: Mosby Int. Ltd., 1998.
[55] CLIA Requirements for Analytical Quality. Westgard
Quality Corporation http://www.westgard.com/clia.htm
|
Back to Top

|
 

|  |